Search for: "State v. Ferrari"
Results 101 - 119
of 119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:59 pm
in reply to imagethief -> Latest China Hearsay: Apple CEO Meets With China’s Vice Premier: A Guide http://t.co/oAbpdTIF -> King & Wood: New Law on Prevention and Treatment of Occupational Diseases Strengthens the Protection for Employees http://t.co/FN6d4DFp -> Clifford Chance: FCPA: Facilitating Payments v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
12 May 2022, 2:17 am
’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1, 21. [2] See, eg, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, art 19(3). [3] SPEECH Act s 3; United States Code, title 28, Part VI, § 4102. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm
Siracusano (2011) and Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am
Here take a look at this Ferrari 458 Italia Akaprovic. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:14 pm
Particularly, the Court of Justice refers to Ferrari v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 4:34 am
By way of example, there is already OHIM case law relating to designs used on toy cars as opposed to real cars (Supermarked A/S v Ferrari SPA, ICD 842, 13 November 2006), as well as a decision of the Court of Appeal of England & Wales relating to a design that can function as both a laundry aid, and a massage device (Green Lane Products Ltd v PMS International Group Plc & Ors [2008] EWCA 358). [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
As a consequence, courts were urged to develop the notion of frustration of the contract, which allows for termination of an agreement when the circumstances are “in a fundamental respect different from those which were envisaged”.6)In the definition of Davis Contractos Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:34 am
If we have viability at 21 weeks, he says, shouldn't that help further erode the framework of Roe v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:55 am
Archivado en: Educación, Noticia destacada, NOTICIAS, Transmisiones 20122, VÍDEOS [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
He spent the cash on using private jets and a Ferrari and on expensive holidays. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Against this background the author discusses, in the context of refusal to supply abuses both in and outside an IP context, the operationalisation of the criterion of harm to consumers (section IV) before concluding (section V). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
At minimum, bribery covers not just the taking but the giving of a bribe, and state of mind is key. [read post]
