Search for: "State v. Foreman" Results 101 - 120 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2023, 3:52 pm by Amy Howe
He asked the justices to put his execution on hold and decide whether the court’s 2017 decision in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Florian Mueller
While the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave every indication at a December hearing that the grossly erroneous non-copyrightability holding in Oracle v. [read post]
As Professor Foreman states, "By teaching juvenile offenders to address their past misdeeds, to read and to imagine a future, the Missouri system prepares them to become productive, law-abiding citizens. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:10 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
” Trial Judge’s Ex Parte Communication with Jurors Causes Conviction Reversal The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
[ABC News] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Apple, Apple v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 6:15 am
Louisiana Issue:  Whether the Sixth Amendment, as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, allows criminal convictions based on non-unanimous jury verdicts.And this one shows how times have changed:Case name:  Lowery, et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am by Florian Mueller
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:23 am by Susan Brenner
He and Lopez talked, and Harris reported his findings to Paul Hart, a foreman. [read post]
12 May 2014, 2:04 pm by Florian Mueller
Oracle once stated its intent to "bring Android back into the Java fold" by making Google comply with the Java rules the rest of the industry has accepted. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am by Ray Mullman
It continues: "On March 23, 2010, the MICH and SEEVA companies, Grunstein and Foreman, and others sued Schron and his affiliates in New York's Supreme Court, New York County, in an action captioned MICH II Holdings LLC, et al. v. [read post]