Search for: "State v. GC" Results 101 - 120 of 462
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2019, 4:44 am by Simon Lester
The final part of the book (Chapter V) goes beyond narrow legal arguments and asks about possible motives of the US for the blockage. [read post]
It should also be noted that Google used geo-blocking to stop a user apparently in an EU Member State from accessing the content de-referenced in the Google search page in his/her Member State through a search page of a non-EU Member State where the content was not de-referenced. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
GC & Others v CNIL The Court was asked a number of questions, all of which broadly related to the question of how the prohibitions on processing sensitive personal data under the Directive applied to search engines. [read post]
On August 14, 2019, the NLRB issued its first decision addressing employer conduct related to mandatory arbitration agreements and Section 7 activity since the Supreme Court decided Epic Systems Corp v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
Related Musings:Should a Subcontractor provide bonds to a GC who is…Subcontractors Must be Careful Providing Bonds when…English v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm by INFORRM
In February 2017, Constantin Film sought before the GC the annulment of the contested decision but the GC dismissed the action and upheld the initial EUIPO ruling (see Case T-69/17). [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm by Keahn Morris and John Bolesta
Apparent Conflict Between Federal and State Law In seemingly direct conflict with these federal pronouncements are state cases like Dynamex v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic took a look at the recent confirmation from the Swedish Supreme Court that the storage of infringing goods with a view to sell them might trigger both civil and criminal liability in a recent case.InternKat Antonella Gentile looked into the decision of the General Court of the European Union (GC) in its judgment in KID-Systeme v EUIPO - Sky (SKYFi) T-354/18 that gave the GC the opportunity to analyse the… [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Judgment Having stated the general principles regarding the competing interests between Articles 8 and 10 ECHR, the Court set out the relevant aspects of freedom of expression where the liability of an online publisher for publication anonymous comments is in question, as articulated in Delfi AS v Estonia [GC], no. 64569/09, § 137, ECHR 2015. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:32 pm
Last Thursday Advocate General (AG) Kokott handed down her Opinion in case C-104/18 P Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ v Euipo (C-104/18 P). [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:14 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cyberheat CA Appeals Court: Claims Under State Spam Statute Not Preempted by CAN-SPAM – Hypertouch v. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
In Novartis v EUIPO, T‑678/15 and T‑679/15 the GC had established that a sign which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector is capable of being distinctive.The GC disagreed.The sign was not likely to be perceived as representing the letter ‘v’ of the word ‘vericiguat’. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
The General Court (“GC”) held that such a prohibition may be justified provided certain conditions are met. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]