Search for: "State v. Galvan"
Results 101 - 120
of 186
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2012, 6:10 am
In Parker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Article V of Georgia’s Uniform Rules of the Road addresses the right and duties of pedestrians. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
Article V of Georgia’s Uniform Rules of the Road addresses the right and duties of pedestrians. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
And unfortunately the time lag between emissions and impacts means that it's very hard to galvanize political will on the timframe needed. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 5:12 pm
Take, for example, Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
They noted that based on the evidence it was not plain error for the district court to conclude that the deed at issue was void for lack of consideration.The Court stated in Kennedy Oil v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
They noted that based on the evidence it was not plain error for the district court to conclude that the deed at issue was void for lack of consideration.The Court stated in Kennedy Oil v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:12 am
Zubrod of Zubrod Law Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Mary Elizabeth Galvan of Galvan & Fritzen, Laramie, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Defendant): No brief filed.Date of Decision: June 6, 2011Facts: Appellant and Appellee Christiansen are both residents of Wyoming. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
Holder “might galvanize a Supreme Court majority to say ‘Enough! [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:50 am
Galvan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Second, since the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in California State Teachers’ Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 4:52 am
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
As John Vile argues in his insightful 2016 book, Convention Wisdom, if state legislators control the convention calls and later ratification of the convention’s proposals, they should definitely not also fill the convention itself: checks and balances are essential within the Article V convention process (p.146). [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:41 pm
Thus Story’s statement in Martin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 3:59 pm
Given the resources you have to defend this as a financial services provider (see Gucci v Curveal), I doubt that there are beads of sweat on your forehead as you read this. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
Additional Resources: Grogan v. [read post]
