Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2018, 9:51 am
The court made clear in Concepcion and American Express Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
Silver v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am
Ceresia, after a Frye hearing (see Frye v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
The use tax is imposed on the purchaser of the good or service but, historically, states have struggled to enforce the tax against individual purchasers. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:45 am
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 3:26 am
Most Jurors have good intentions. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:38 pm
(Supreme Court of the State of Idaho, January 29, 2019, Scout LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:06 pm
The cases are EPA v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 7:26 am
Likewise, in Montana v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
In Michigan, the parental kidnapping statute states that if a parent keeps the child from the other parent more than 24 hours after the child was supposed to be returned, then that is parental kidnapping, which is a felony bearing up to 1 year and a day sentence in prison. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:32 am
The Judge noted that there was a “longstanding line of precedent holding that a defendant asserting a good faith defense has waived privilege over communications which have a bearing on the defendant’s state of mind. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
The prison officials could offer no good reason for restricting the inmate’s beard. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
Peterson, 601 F.3d 1065, 1070 (10th Cir. 2010) (stating, in the context of a § 1983 action, “[t]he officers bear the burden of establishing that the threats posed exigent circumstances justifying the warrantless entry”); Hardesty v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 5:04 pm
Such a pleading often runs but several pages, and in substance it states that the Bad Guy defendant does some thing or things that infringe the Good Person plaintiff's patent. [read post]
