Search for: "State v. Goulding"
Results 101 - 120
of 686
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2020, 1:32 pm
It happens here.The opening paragraph of the opinion by Judge Gould sets the tone for the rest of the thing:"For more than a decade, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) has waited in vain for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to respond to its administrative petition requesting that the Agency end the use of a dangerous pesticide in household pet products. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 4:05 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 10:07 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:18 am
& T.S., YINC DA 19-0210 2019 MT 267 Civil – Dependent Neglect State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d at 279, the Appellate Division held that as Respondent had adequately certified that "no requested documents could be found after a diligent search," the Supreme Court had properly dismissed the Petitioner's Article 78 action.* Public Officers Law §89[4][a] provides that a failure to respond is deemed a constructive denial of a Freedom of Information Law request.** The statute, however, does not specify the… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d at 279, the Appellate Division held that as Respondent had adequately certified that "no requested documents could be found after a diligent search," the Supreme Court had properly dismissed the Petitioner's Article 78 action.* Public Officers Law §89[4][a] provides that a failure to respond is deemed a constructive denial of a Freedom of Information Law request.** The statute, however, does not specify the… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d at 279, the Appellate Division held that as Respondent had adequately certified that "no requested documents could be found after a diligent search," the Supreme Court had properly dismissed the Petitioner's Article 78 action.* Public Officers Law §89[4][a] provides that a failure to respond is deemed a constructive denial of a Freedom of Information Law request.** The statute, however, does not specify the… [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:00 am
Citing Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d at 279, the Appellate Division held that as Respondent had adequately certified that "no requested documents could be found after a diligent search," the Supreme Court had properly dismissed the Petitioner's Article 78 action.* Public Officers Law §89[4][a] provides that a failure to respond is deemed a constructive denial of a Freedom of Information Law request.** The statute, however, does not specify the… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Citizens, 1919-1924Conveners: Kenneth Mack, Harvard Law School (kmack@law.harvard.edu), Laurie Wood, Florida State University (lmwood@fsu.edu), Jacqueline Briggs, University of Toronto - Centre for Criminology and Sociolegal Studies (jacq.briggs@mail.utoronto.ca), and John Wertheimer, Davidson College (jow [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 3:08 pm
Pizzuto v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
By the evening, Rose stated that Mikayla “felt like she was on fire,” although she did not have a thermometer to measure her temperature due to the move. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
” “”An account stated is an agreement between the parties to an account based upon prior transactions between them with respect to the correctness of the separate items composing the account and the balance due, if any, in favor of one party or the other” (Shea & Gould v Burr, 194 AD2d 369, 370 [1st Dept 1993] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
