Search for: "State v. Harding" Results 101 - 120 of 16,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2009, 5:41 pm
I am not persuaded that he did, but even if we make that assumption, it is hard to see how the Court is justified in micromanaging the day-to-day business of state tribunals making fact-intensive decisions of this kind. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 8:06 am by MSP Education Blog
  The Court came down hard on Central States’ policy language indicating that it clearly violated the MSPA. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 5:08 am
It appears that same-sex marriages are not the only marriages today that are hard to come by in some parts of the United States. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm by Amy Howe
The state appealed to the Supreme Court, which announced earlier this year that it would review both Lamone v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Securites Lawprof
Both Judge Rakoff and attorneys for the SEC have worked hard over the holidays! [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 5:32 am by Transplanted Lawyer
Ahmed Ghaliani was accused of being a significant participant in the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States embassy complexes in Kenya and Tanzania. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:20 am by Paul Caron
New York Times op-ed: The Tax Cut for the Rich That Democrats Love, by Richard V. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:31 am by Gregory Forman
Some of the more cryptic opinions to come out of the South Carolina Supreme Court simply state “We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision in [case name]. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: It is always a hard case when fundamental interests collide, but the Fourth Circuit’s decision in Snyder v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:30 pm
Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway is reviewing the state's 38 death row cases, including the two that initiated the Supreme Court challenge in Baze v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 3:55 am by Heather K. Gerken
Two days ago, I began describing a forthcoming paper of mine offering a new take on Windsor v. [read post]