Search for: "State v. Harsh"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,665
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
United States and United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2002, 10:00 pm
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals decision in Hyde Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONMatter of 495 Estates v New York State Div. of Hous. [read post]
31 Dec 2002, 10:00 pm
In its ruling, the Supreme Court upheld the Court of Appeals decision in Hyde Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:33 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 1:42 pm
The Court relied on Dabur India Ltd v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:57 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:39 am
Back in October, in the case of Jones v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 3:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 10:34 am
She's just applying the law.But it's an exceptionally harsh -- and potentially arbitrary -- mistress. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:36 pm
On May 9, 2011, United States District Judge David C. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:31 am
The Court stated that although the decision in Monk is harsh, it would be a harsh result for the other tenants and the landlord if the rule was not so strict. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
Kline (serving pro tempore) in the matter State of Louisiana v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 7:08 am
In NFIB v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Auto Stiegler, Inc. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1064, 1071-1072; "overly harsh" (Armendariz v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 2:36 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 12:44 pm
Alabama remains unconstitutionally harsh. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Last summer, the need to further turn our attention to the states was thrown into sharp relief following the Supreme Court’s egregious decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 12:25 pm
Relatively harsh words from the Ninth Circuit this morning.The majority -- Judge Wardlaw, joined by Judge Silverman -- believe that there was a plea deal (and that the state breached it). [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
One was whether the Court had jurisdiction to review a collateral state court’s decision not to apply Miller v. [read post]
