Search for: "State v. Hicks #1" Results 101 - 120 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed & Ors v Ministry of Defence & Anor, heard 1–4 February 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 28 June 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R (Hicks & Ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis, considering whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or (b). [read post]
27 May 2016, 1:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
It was argued that despite Article 7(1) merely stating that “[n]or shall a heavier penalty be imposed than one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed”, ECtHR jurisprudence required a more expansive interpretation and, in particular, guaranteed the right to a more lenient penalty provided for in a subsequent law i.e. lex mitior (Scoppola v Italy (No 2) Application 10249/03). [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 4:41 am
Michael Hicks provided the opposition view, focusing  on the legal test. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The BGI singles them out and therefore directly identifies them for the purposes of section 1(1) (a) of the DPA…” ([115]). [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A private detective has only the right of a private person with respect to arrest, Dohery v. [read post]