Search for: "State v. I. A."
Results 101 - 120
of 94,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2024, 2:55 pm
Then, I will discuss what Murthy (and NRA v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 1:54 pm
" Gross v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Moreover, Bucklew itself appears to be inconsistent with cases such as New York State Rifle Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm
United States of America (Cultural Resource Damages; Resource Equivalency Analysis) United States of America v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
In Cajune v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:12 pm
In Cajune v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
”[6] In a policy statement from just a few years ago, the FTC agreed that mergers can promote innovation: [I]n dynamic sectors characterized by high R&D costs, firms with broad scale and scope may have unique incentives and capabilities to invest in innovation. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:07 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:52 am
Synder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:11 am
I would add that Department of Commerce was another case in which special solicitude for state litigants may have played a role, even if the Court did not say as much. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:06 am
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:43 am
From an originalist perspective, NLRB v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:56 am
I’ve been following Snyder v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:44 am
(J.L. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am
But in multiple lawsuits filed around the country, including one in which I served as counsel for the plaintiffs, courts repeatedly found the termination decisions unlawful. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, et al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 5:23 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Expect the same from me and/or my co-bloggers for the rest of the week and possibly into next week if the Term is extended.In the meantime, before you log into SCOTUSblog or start refreshing the webpage open to the SCOTUS homepage every ten seconds, I thought I'd offer some morning snark about the dishonesty or incompetence on display in Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in United States v. [read post]