Search for: "State v. Ibrahim"
Results 101 - 120
of 161
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
Ibrahim Yumnu, Vinicio Cardoso, and Tung Chi Duong were convicted of first-degree murder. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm
Looks like Mohammed Ibrahim Makkawi, wanted in connection with the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya, was arrested in Cairo today. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
On Monday 20 February 2012 Eady J handed down judgment in Ibrahim v Swansea University (heard 13 February 2012)([2012] EWHC 290 (QB)). [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:21 am
Imagine that the Department of Homeland Security erroneously placed you on the No-Fly List, and as a result, you were not allowed to take a flight, were detained for several hours in the airport, had your visa revoked, and were left outside the United States for years with no way to return. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
. “This article is inaccurate and misrepresents the facts” the corporation stated, as reported by Tabloid Watch here. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
An interesting ruling from the 9th Circuit yesterday in Ibrahim v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:17 pm
See Ibrahim v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:59 am
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:55 pm
Today’s State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
United States (Arizona's likely appeal to the Supreme Court of United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:28 pm
Jain v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:14 pm
’ “Honestly, what did the boss, Ibrahim Mansi, think she was going to say? [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:05 pm
As a result, choice of law and jurisdiction rules potentially expose firms that do business nationally or internationally to oppressive law in any of the US states. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 10:22 am
Supreme Court decision in Hall v. [read post]
