Search for: "State v. J. B." Results 101 - 120 of 6,731
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
This post comes to us from professors Anthony J. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 4:50 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
b) Does the approach to a claim to a single chemical compound differ from a class? [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The 1997 PDRS was in use, and it specifically stated that its MDT was intended as a guide only. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:44 am by Unknown
Armistice Capital, LLC, March 27, 2024, Rochon, J.).Exchange Act Section 16(b) bars short-swing insider profits (and the court held that derivative plaintiffs do have Article III standing to bring Section 16(b) claims). [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a result, on May 13, 2022, petitioner sent an email stating that it was appealing OCA's constructive denial, and on May 27, 2022, OCA constructively denied that appeal by failing to respond within the 10 business days permitted under Public Officers Law § 89(4)(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As a result, on May 13, 2022, petitioner sent an email stating that it was appealing OCA's constructive denial, and on May 27, 2022, OCA constructively denied that appeal by failing to respond within the 10 business days permitted under Public Officers Law § 89(4)(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accepting the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d at 87-88), the complaint sufficiently stated a cause of action alleging legal malpractice against the law firm defendants (see Shaya B. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: The Role of Barnette in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
The Court concluded there were extensive human rights violations and ordered the State to provide specialized medical assistance to the victims, pay compensation for both material losses and pain and suffering, and publicly acknowledge its wrongdoing. [read post]