Search for: "State v. J. S." Results 101 - 120 of 21,838
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am by Amy Howe
A year later, the Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
May (The Free State Foundation) & Andrew Magloughlin (The Free State Foundation) have posted NFIB V. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:55 am by Victoria Clark
The government's brief in opposition, Paracha's petition for a writ of certiorari, and the lower court decisions are available below. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am by Guy Stuckey-Clarke, Olswang LLP
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:13 am
An intriguing headline at Snopes.The since-rescinded memo, sent from the VA Office of the Assistant Under Secretary of Health for Operations, stated that photo should be removed on the grounds that it depicted a non-consensual kiss: "This memorandum requests the removal of the 'V-J Day in Times Square' photograph from all Veterans Health Administration facilities in alignment with the Department of Veterans Affairs' commitment to maintaining a… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:00 pm
Like their federal counterparts, New York States rules on class actions “favor the maintenance of class actions” and support “a liberal interpretation. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by John Lewis
The appellate court held that J & G’s waiver of the right to arbitrate Collado’s FLSA claim did “not extend to the state law claims that were pleaded for the first time after J & G had litigated to the point of waiver of the FLSA claims. [read post]