Search for: "State v. James T. Brooks" Results 101 - 120 of 184
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Massachussets Institute of Technology)Barankay Iwan (University of Pennsylvania)Barry Brian (University of Chicago)Bartkus James R. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
James Malcom of the University of Hertfordshire. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Just because a work is in the public domain in the United States doesn’t mean it’s not protected by copyright elsewhere—and vice versa. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:08 am by Benjamin Bissell
Today marks the beginning of oral arguments in the landmark Zivotofsky v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:00 am
Is this (“Approval Ratings: The Public v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alaska – Report from Alaska Campaign Regulator Says Tshibaka-Linked Group Violated State Law Yahoo News – James Brooks (Alaska Beacon) | Published: 8/26/2023 Staff for the Alaska Public Offices Commission recommended a $16,450 fine against Preserve Democracy, a group led by former U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 7:54 am by Charlie Dunlap
But if your seatmate happens to be Rosa Brooks, you know you’re going to have an interesting and thoughtful ride. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Christina Aguilera, Katy Perry, Steve Tyler, Lionel Richie and Garth Brooks were just some of music’s biggest names want to make it harder to pirate music online calling for “drastic reforms” to the Act.In [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
, (EDTexweblog.com), (Patent Prospector), (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (IPBiz), (Against Monopoly), (Philip Brooks), (IPBiz), Indian government to consider whether to grant compulsory licenses to Natco for the exportation of generic versions of Tarceva and Sutent (Sunitinib) to Nepal : (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP), (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (IP Law360), (Spicy IP),GlobalGlobal - GeneralIntellectual privilege or imaginary property? [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 9:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Two Guantanamo-related cases set dates for oral argument: Al Janko v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Supreme Court reached a decision today in Riley v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
I’ve recently started working on a book about reformers’ ideologies and strategies in Sheff v. [read post]