Search for: "State v. Jan G." Results 101 - 120 of 583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm by Peter Steinmeyer
Jan. 28, 2014), Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, declined to follow Fifield, holding that “[g]iven the contradictory holdings of the lower Illinois courts and the lack of a clear direction from the Illinois Supreme Court, this Court does not find it appropriate to apply a bright line rule” regarding what constitutes sufficient consideration for a non-compete. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Federal law (18 U.S.C. 922(g)) sets up 9 categories of persons who are prohibited from possessing firearms. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:10 am by Robert Chesney
For the Convention system, in its recent judgment in Gäfgen v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Both the federal trial and appellate cases in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 2:19 pm by Peter (Pete) A. Steinmeyer
Jan. 28, 2014), Judge Ruben Castillo, the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, declined to follow Fifield, holding that “[g]iven the contradictory holdings of the lower Illinois courts and the lack of a clear direction from the Illinois Supreme Court, this Court does not find it appropriate to apply a bright line rule” regarding what constitutes sufficient consideration for a non-compete. [read post]