Search for: "State v. Jost"
Results 101 - 120
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 3:42 am
But at Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost cites the case of a Texas widow denied federal Social Security benefits because the state does not recognize her marriage as “prov[ing] the need for the court to act — sooner, not later. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 7:16 am
Briefly: At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost discusses a recent decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court that orders “sweeping new changes in the state’s court system to control the use of often unreliable eyewitness testimony. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
At Just Security, William Dodge discusses last week’s oral argument in Jesner v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 3:56 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost explains why federal court intervention is necessary to curb political gerrymanders. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:06 am
At E&E News, Pamela King reports on a new cert petition in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
At ACSblog, Timothy Jost discusses his new article with Jim Engstrand in which they argue that over fifty “other provisions of the ACA . . . become anomalous, if not absurd, if the words ‘established by the State’ are read to exclude FFEs. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 1:32 am
UPDATE: Kentucky Law Blog has published a link to this article, but I was compelled to comment: Sarah Jost Nielsen wrote all the case digests. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am
Commentary and coverage focus on the Supreme Court’s decision last week to review New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
” At Concurring Opinions,” Edward Zelinsky urges the Court to grant cert. in Gobeille v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
Coverage of the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
” Kenneth Jost weighs in on the Kennedy opinion at Jost on Justice, contending that Kennedy “rightly suggests the courts as the most likely forum for stemming a cruel but not-so-unusual punishment. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
” In today’s second case, United States v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am
” And at Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost contends that, although “[s]ome legal observers dismissed the mistake as a mere typo, . . . it was more than that. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
Ken Jost also discusses the case at his eponymous Jost on Justice blog, observing that “[s]upporters of race-based admissions policies fear — and their opponents hope — that a Supreme Court ruling to reinstate the Michigan measure will encourage other states to follow suit in prohibiting racial preferences in university admissions. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:08 pm
Justice Elena Kagan made the same point in her opinion last year in Michigan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:41 am
Briefly: In Newsweek, Ian McDougall looks ahead at the issues in United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 4:51 am
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost argues that if Richard Glossip, the named petitioner in Glossip v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:11 am
Kenneth Jost of Jost on Justice mulls over the Supreme Court’s approach to prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
