Search for: "State v. K. K. C."
Results 101 - 120
of 2,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 9:03 am
Carter p/k/a Jay-Z, et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 9:07 pm
Am Beispiel der allgemeinen Rechtsprinzipien des Völkerrechts (Art 38 Abs 1 lit c IGH Statut) wird gezeigt, daß man mit Hilfe der Reinen Rechtslehre die herrschende Völkerrechtslehre auf eine neue Basis stellen kann. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 9:07 pm
Olsson, V. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 6:16 am
Noble v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 2:59 pm
The case of Spišák v. the Czech Republic highlights differential treatment between juveniles and adults during pre-trial detention. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Fla., July 12, 2010)(K. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Law Lessons from MICHELE VIDAL f/k/a MICHELE GELAK v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
By Joseph C. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 6:30 am
C. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 9:21 am
Notmeyer v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:45 am
Contents include: Loveday Hodson & Troy Lavers, Feminist Judgments in International Law: An Introduction Christine Chinkin, Gina Heathcote, Emily Jones & Henry Jones, Bozkurt Case, aka the Lotus Case (France v Turkey): Ships that Go Bump in the Night Kasey McCall-Smith, Rhona Smith & Ekaterina Yahyaoui Krivenko, Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide Kathryn Greenman & Troy Lavers, The Lockerbie Case (Libyan Arab… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:19 am
Wylie II, Molly K. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
It was also stated that C’s decision represented a disproportionate interference with A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, given their status as British Citizens.C upheld its decision on review, maintaining that Article 8 had no application to the case. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
It was also stated that C’s decision represented a disproportionate interference with A’s and K’s Article 8 rights, given their status as British Citizens.C upheld its decision on review, maintaining that Article 8 had no application to the case. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 11:56 pm
Rather, the sole issue was to assess whether the period between the initial stop and the K-9 alert was an unreasonable detention under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
C. [read post]
6 May 2012, 1:45 pm
Marra & Sonia K. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
Bay Shore v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm
In Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629, the Court of Appeal considered whether the application of the bedroom rule in the housing benefit regulations as regards private rented accommodation discriminated against those who needed an extra bedroom for a carer or because their children could not share a room as a result of disability (see here for our discussion of the Upper Tribunal decisions). [read post]
