Search for: "State v. Klein" Results 101 - 120 of 839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Sarah Barringer Gordon and Kathleen Brown, have received a Klein Family Social Justice grant from Penn Arts & Sciences for Free State Slavery and Bound Labor: Pennsylvania. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ward v Klein  2022 NY Slip Op 02153 [203 AD3d 1216] March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department represents the “no harm-no foul” analysis frequently applied to legal malpractice claims. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:32 am by David Klein
Readers will remember that last year’s landmark Supreme Court decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
10 May 2022, 11:18 am by Katherine Pompilio
The legislation was quickly passed in the wake of a leaked controversial draft decision indicating that the court could overturn the landmark abortion rights case Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:15 am by David Klein
Supreme Court forever changed the telemarketing world with its opinion in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Similarly,  Ward v Klein 2022 NY Slip Op 02153 Decided on March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department describes how an attorney quit just before an appellate filing deadline, without any liability. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ward v Klein 2022 NY Slip Op 02154 Decided on March 30, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department gives an explanation of how and when a CPLR 205 recommencement of an action is viable and when it is not. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:15 am by David Klein
On March 22, 2022, the NY Court of Appeals (“COA”) released its decision in the case entitled White v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That the Kleins may do something in the future is not sufficient to state actual damages nor does it show that plaintiff was negligent (Kahan Jewelry Corp. v Rosenfeld, 295 AD2d 261, 261, 744 NYS2d 664 (Mem) [1st Dept 2002] [finding that pending foreclosure actions meant plaintiffs had not yet sustained any actual damages]). [read post]