Search for: "State v. Ku" Results 101 - 120 of 422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2019, 6:11 am by Mikhaila Fogel
VanLandingham dug into the Edward Gallagher case and former Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 8:19 am
Here is the abstract:This essay is the introduction to a Lewis & Clark Law Review symposium on the Supreme Court's decision last term in Sanchez-Llamas v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by An Hertogen
First, the US Supreme Court hearings in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bureau of Indian Education (Indian Education) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlRobbins v. [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Anushka Limaye, Victoria Clark
Arzan Tarapore explained how India can help the United States check China’s rise in region. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Mary L. Dudziak
:Insurrections & Infections: Rethinking the Legal History of Atlanta, 1920-1940 – InmanChair - Robert Baker, Georgia State UniversityPolly Price, Emory University, “Federalization of the Mosquito: Malaria and Public Health In the Southern United States, 1900-1945”Maryan Soliman, University of Pennsylvania, “Racial Equality on Trial in Atlanta during the 1930s”Anders Walker, Saint Louis University, “Scarlett’s Rainbow: Margaret Mitchell,… [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:18 pm by Matt Cooper
The plaintiffs’ amended complaint alleges that President Trump violated the Voting Rights Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act by pressuring state legislatures to override the popular vote and appoint Presidential electors. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:41 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Board of Education.In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
The court considered a number of authorities in this regard, including X and Y v The Netherlands (App no 8978/80) and KU v Finland (App no 2872/02), in which the Strasbourg court had indicated that ECHR, art 8 placed a positive obligation on states to put in place effective deterrence measures against activities which may pose a threat to fundamental values and essential aspects of the private lives of individuals, particularly children and other vulnerable… [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 7:35 pm by Matt Cooper
Trump, the plaintiffs amended their complaint to add a claim that the President violated the Ku Klux Klan Act in allegedly pressuring state legislatures to override the popular vote and appoint Presidential electors. [read post]