Search for: "State v. Lien"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,470
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2019, 9:49 am
Diamond Beach, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:46 am
The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled in Beck v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
" "In Leon v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
Youville Hospital v. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 5:09 am
McGranahan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 7:00 am
A recent case out of the Western District of Virginia federal court, McCarthy Building Companies Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am
The Fairfax case, The Barber of Seville, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:52 pm
” Marston v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
Lien laws vary from state-to-state, but across the country it’s a consistent principle that contractors and suppliers can only file mechanic’s liens for work they perform on a construction improvement project. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
Because such leverage is widely viewed as an unwarranted extension of the lien’s purpose to provide security for payment, many states have statutes authorizing lien release bonds, allowing an owner or general contractor to discharge the lien by substituting a bond. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 5:53 am
All contractors and subcontractors in the State of Florida should know that a contractor and a subcontractor may each claim a lien for the same work on a particular project. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
Graves v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:06 pm
Dep’t of Human Services. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
” The case is Williams v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:56 am
In Erwin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
The court ruled that the state supreme court’s 2014 ruling in West v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 8:08 am
Kelly v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:24 pm
In Bloomfield State Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:47 am
This conclusion was firmly based on Paedergat Boat and Racquet Club, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 4:34 am
The lien is imposed on the client's cause of action, in whatever form it may take during the course of litigation, and follows the proceeds, wherever they may be found (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]). [read post]
