Search for: "State v. List" Results 101 - 120 of 27,435
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm by rtruman
5th Cir OKs State’s Refusal to List Same-Sex Couple as Parents on New Birth Cert for Adopted Son :: Adar v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm by Shea Denning
Last December, the North Carolina Supreme Court added to that list with its opinion in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:29 am by Peter Hirtle
  Rosenberg v Zimet concerned the ownership of a version of "Schindler's List," the list of essential employees used by Oskar Schindler to protect many of them from transportation to death camps. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 8:48 am by Leiza Dolghih
  Recently, a Texas Court of Appeals in Cooper Valves, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2024, 6:04 am by Norman L. Eisen
Georgia State Election Board Rule Challenge (Abhiraman, et al., v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:40 pm
NEW TRIAL LISTING SYSTEM - MURPHY J1.I intend implementing a new trial listing system for matters within my docket.2.I am doing so having consulted with a number of members of the professionand other judges, including judges in other States.3.Despite the increasing complexity of matters being dealt with by this court,matters continue to settle at, or very close to, "the door of the court" or whichadjourn. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:37 am by traceydennis
Regina (Maftah and another) v Secretary of State for the Foreign Office and Commonwealth Affairs [2011] EWCA Civ 350;  [2011] WLR (D)  135 “The determination of a claim for judicial review challenging decisions whereby the claimants were placed, as persons believed to be associated with terrorism, on a list the effect of which was that their assets were frozen and release of any funds was placed in the discretion of the state, would… [read post]