Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 101 - 120 of 28,739
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2024, 9:00 pm by SCOTUSblog
ShareOn Thursday, May 23, we live blogged as the court released opinions in Coinbase v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Judge Wright puts it plainly stating that ICE's practice can be more accurately termed "knock and arrests" and "violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am by Doriane Coleman
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
   Particularly in the wake of the Hamas-led butchering, raping, and kidnapping of civilians – including Americans – living peacefully within Israel's 1948 borders, the Harvard letter truly disgusted me. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
Criminal Law: Language RightsR. v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm by Josh Blackman
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Though often hailed as an originalist triumph, Dobbs v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:15 am by Zachary Stolz
Both cases could affect the lives of thousands of veterans. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm by Stephen E. Sachs
Was this "a form of living constitutionalism," or a "living traditionalism," or something more exotic still? [read post]
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am by Eric Goldman
The Facts The Supreme Court summarized the basic facts with admirable concision: This dispute had its start in a decades-old, short-lived music venture. [read post]