Search for: "State v. M. S. P." Results 101 - 120 of 4,549
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
” Similarly, “[m]ergers resulting in unconcentrated markets are unlikely to have adverse competitive effects and ordinarily require no further analysis. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:29 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP)
The other two are APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P) and SHOPPI (Shopify v EUIPO, C-751/22 P, see here and here)). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
  It so happens that last week, United States District Court Judge Michael M. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Reminiscent of the Wars of the Roses, our Supreme Court’s recent opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:55 pm by Unknown
The taxpayer pointed out that the definition of alternative fuel in the credit statute states that alternative fuel “means—(A) liquefied petroleum gas, (B) P Series Fuels . . . . [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 738, at p. 740). [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:51 am by Myles Jelf (Bristows)
A further set of complications as between validity and infringement arose in Edwards v Meril, this time not courtesy of the CMS. [read post]