Search for: "State v. MM"
Results 101 - 120
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
F.S. 57.105 does state that: 1. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:40 am
Interpreting the Contract Often many people believe that the clearly stated words in a contract will govern their legal rights. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:40 am
Interpreting the Contract Often many people believe that the clearly stated words in a contract will govern their legal rights. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:01 am
Dist Bd. of Educ v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
Mm-hm.Q. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
Evidence from the Government revealed that the MIR formed “part of an overall programme of reform intended to reduce net migration and restore public confidence in the immigration system” although it was not stated to be the primary objective of the reform. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:35 pm
” The parties in DM v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 6:33 am
The rest of the world outside China would be divided into Major Markets (MM) and Other Markets (OM). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
This international application filed under the PCT [hereinafter referred to as "international application" or "subsequent application"], for which the EPO acted as designated Office, had been filed in the name of Tenaris Connections AG as applicant for all designated states except the United States of America and of five natural persons as applicants for the United States of America on 6 September 2003. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 2:18 am
However the Immigration Rules and the Immigration Directorate Instruction on family migration unlawfully failed to take proper account of the Secretary of State’s duty in respect of the welfare of children under the Borders, Citizenship and Immigration Act 2009, s 55. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am
Central Command spokesman Major Josh Jacques said that 5,265 armor-piercing 30 mm rounds containing depleted uranium were shot from U.S. aircraft. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
R (MM) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another case, heard 22–24 February 2016. [read post]
