Search for: "State v. Magness" Results 101 - 120 of 225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am by INFORRM
The witnesses stated that they were unexpectedly touched by PVDD in a sexually suggestive manner, which felt like sexual intimidation. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
The answer is clear from C-182/14 P MEGA Brands International v OHIM (the 'MAGNEXT' case), in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) set aside the General Court's decision and remitted the action for further consideration.As already reported by the IPKat here, the story began when the Luxembourg company MEGA Brands applied for two CTMs for MAGNEXT. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
Many states have legislation on the books that insulates non-manufacturing intermediate sellers from strict liability. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am by SHG
After learning of the Supreme Court’s grant of cert in Rodriguez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
  Where a federal requirement permits a course of conduct and the state makes it obligatory, the state’s requirement is in addition to the federal requirement and thus is preempted.McMullen v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Wyeth, Inc., 2011 WL 1343392, at *6-7 (Mag. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
As the CJEU’s case law proves, such requirement applies to any kind of trade mark which is indistinguishable from the appearance of the products, be it a three-dimensional trade mark [Procter & Gamble v OHIM, Joined Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P; Mag Instrument v OHIM, Case C-136/02 P and Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, Case C-173/04 P), a figurative trade mark consisting of a two-dimensional… [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 2012 WL 7784402, at *4 (Mag. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
Pursuant to a search and seizure warrant issued by this Court on March 18, 2014, see In the Matter of the Search of the Premises Located at Georgetown University [REDACTED], Mag. [read post]