Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 101 - 120
of 34,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2011, 8:37 pm
NOT CHARGED – Possession of Steroids for Sale, State v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 2:26 pm
In State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:00 am
In a previous post, we considered the factual background to the appeals before the Supreme Court this week in the cases of R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am
Indiana Attorney General Curtis Hill(R) took the position in Box v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:39 am
January 13, 2011), R&R United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:49 am
Others will pick this up and run with it, but for starters, here are some State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 10:57 am
Avila v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:00 am
In regards to the proportionality argument, Lord Clarke stated that, in this case, the absence of a specified time limit for detention does not infringe the principles in R v Governor of Durham Prison, Ex P Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:39 pm
TunneyThe case of R. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
The judge quashed the Secretary of State’s certificate but declined to make a declaration of incompatibility under the HRA s 4. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
On appeal from: [2018] UKUT 355 (AAC) This case considered the effect of the Supreme Court’s decision in R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 upon the decision-makers in the housing benefit system and the First-tier Tribunal and the Upper Tribunal hearing appeals from local authority decisions – in claims relating to periods before the regulations governing the removal of the spare room subsidy, otherwise known as the… [read post]
31 May 2015, 7:19 am
Alabama has recognized "bad faith" as a tort claim since the 1981 state supreme court decision in Chavers v. [read post]
