Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 101 - 120 of 19,770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2013, 8:50 am by Federalist Society
On June 13, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am by The Docket Navigator
After all, the government splits any award obtained with the relator.It appears, however, that the United States is finally acknowledging publicly that the trend of suits under 35 USC 292 has gone too far, given the rash of thinly pled false marking claims that have come to dominate the landscape since the Federal Circuit’s decision in Forest Group v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am by Hannah Catt
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court issued a per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 9:55 am
 Section 32(3) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 requires (at least for now) that a trade mark applicant must state its good faith intention to use the mark applied for. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:01 am by Justin E. Gray
Recently, a defendant in a false marking case pending before the Western District of Pennsylvania (FLFMC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
Specifically, the Court noted that Recital 6 of the Directive states that “member states should also remain free to fix the provisions of procedure surrounding the registration, the revocation and invalidity of trade marks acquired by registration”. [read post]