Search for: "State v. Mark A. Humphrey" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
If civil rights lawyers begin invoking the principles elaborated and consolidated by popular spokesmen like Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey and  Richard Nixon and Everett Dirksen, and not only depend on the opinions of the Warren and Burger Courts, these justices may begin to embrace an originalist framework that provides this great legacy with a solid foundation in popular sovereignty.Supreme Court litigators have one overriding objective: getting five votes on their side. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
Consider: the same lawyers who parse every word of the great statements by Abraham Lincoln and John Bingham during the First Reconstruction completely ignore comparable speeches by Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey during the Second Reconstruction. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
Ameritech, 129 F.3d 857, 867 (6th Cir. 1997) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Tyndall v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Professor Barnett builds his radically individualistic view of popular sovereignty on Chisholm v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:58 am by Lara
  Award’s Opposition filing asserts that Rami abandoned the EVIL DEAD mark by publicly stating, “We’re never going to do [another] sequel” in the book The Evil Dead Companion. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:34 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Humphreys v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 14 – 15 March 2012. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]