Search for: "State v. Mateo "
Results 101 - 120
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2017, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:37 pm
But as our brief explains, after Barr v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 1:32 pm
” (Citing Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 2:05 pm
County of Sonoma (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1234, and also transferring the matter back to the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Div. 1) for reconsideration in light of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Resources Code, § 21166; CEQA Guidelines, § 15162) in its highly anticipated opinion, filed on September 9, 2016, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
” (Citing Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:55 am
See, for example, the seminal case in this regard, City of Burbank v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 3:34 pm
San Mateo Community College District, Case No. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm
It also held in City of San Diego v CSUSD that the state university system cannot limit its mitigation measures to those specifically funded by the Legislature, affirmed in Newhall Land that greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts can be measured against statewide GHG-reduction targets set out in AB 32, while at the same time finding the State’s GHG analysis lacking. [read post]
26 May 2016, 6:50 pm
It also held in City of San Diego v CSUSD that the state university system cannot limit its mitigation measures to those specifically funded by the Legislature, affirmed in Newhall Land that greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts can be measured against statewide GHG-reduction targets set out in AB 32, while at the same time finding the State’s GHG analysis lacking. [read post]
12 May 2016, 9:59 am
San Mateo County Community College District, Case No. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:19 am
Finding that the action was filed in a state court of competent jurisdiction and was thus not removable, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to remand (Electrical Workers Local #357 Pension and Health & Welfare Trusts v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 3:11 pm
The California Supreme Court held a lively oral argument session this morning (May 4, 2016), at 9:00 a.m. in its San Francisco courtroom in the case of Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:26 pm
More specifically, California state courts as well as federal courts in the Ninth Circuit have concluded (in light of Luther v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:46 pm
The case – Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 3:04 pm
Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
S. 547, and San Mateo County v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
