Search for: "State v. Motor"
Results 101 - 120
of 7,527
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
” The Ninth Circuit diverged from the District Court in its determination of the applicability of Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:46 am
The complaint alleged that on February 12, 2020, she was injured as a result of a motor vehicle collision caused by the defendant, who was driving a truck owned by his employer. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
* In a footnote in its decision, the Appellate Division said "Federal retaliation claims under Title VII are subject to the same standards as those of the New York State Human Rights Law and therefore highly instructive as to the claim at bar", citing Banks v General Motors, LLC, 81 F4th 242 and Collins v Indart-Etienne, 59 Misc 3d 1026.Click HERE to access the Appellate Division's decision Posted on the Internet. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
State of California, Department of Motor Vehicles (2023) 88 Cal. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 3:25 pm
Toyota Motor Corporation announced on Wednesday that it was recalling one million cars due to a flaw that could prevent airbags from deploying, raising the possibility of injuries. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm
In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In CBM Ministries of South Central Pennsylvania, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 4:25 am
In Nimkoff v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Also consider that on Monday, December 11, 2023, in State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 1:25 pm
Simmons v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:10 pm
Corder v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, No. 42 MAP 2022 (Pa. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division explained that "In order to annul an administrative determination made after a hearing, a court must conclude that the record lacks substantial evidence* to support the determination", citing Matter of Khan v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 215 AD3d 844, and Matter of Lau v NYC DOB, 209 AD3d 858. [read post]
