Search for: "State v. Necessary" Results 101 - 120 of 35,843
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2008, 1:51 am
AS and DD (Libya) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 289; [2008] WLR (D) 104 “In order to show strong grounds for believing that a foreign national if deported would face a real risk of being subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment in breach of art 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms it was necessary to produce evidence, not mere speculation, to establish that risk. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 7:12 pm by Rob Wiltbank
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:08 pm
But wait a minute... what about when second guessing is necessary? [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:46 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States’ opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction in Martin v. [read post]
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 9:01 pm by Donna Eng
Florida criminal defense attorneys needing a refresher on police citizen encounters need only take a 5 minute look at State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:18 am by zshapiro
The detention can only last long enough to confirm or reject the evidence necessary to find that the person violated the law. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am by MBettman
The plain language of R.C. 3103.03 clearly states that a necessaries claim against a married person is not dependent on any other statute. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by Renee Hutchins
I appreciate the chance to engage with CoOp readers on the United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
We are planning a series of posts on the DC Circuit's decision in Business Roundtable v. [read post]