Search for: "State v. Ore"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 857 (26 July 2011) Thomas & Ors v Bridgend County Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 862 (26 July 2011) Rust Consulting Ltd v PB Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 899 (26 July 2011) Destiny 1 Ltd v Lloyds TSB Bank Plc [2011] EWCA Civ 831 (26 July 2011) MH (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
The State (Trinidad And Tobago) [2008] UKPC 16 (3 March 2008) Knight v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 2:23 am
Supreme Court Southern Pacific Securities 05-2 Plc v Walker & Anor [2010] UKSC 32 (07 July 2010) HJ (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 31 (07 July 2010) Court of Appeal Gale & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2010] EWCA Civ 759 (07 July 2010) Mentmore International Ltd & Ors v Abbey Healthcare (Festival) Ltd & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 761 (07 July 2010) High Court (Chancery Division)… [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 3:35 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:49 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Vannes KFT v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1466 (20 December 2010) Chester v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1439 (17 December 2010) Autoweld Systems Ltd v Kito Enterprises LLC [2010] EWCA Civ 1469 (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 3344 (Ch)… [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534… [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
They made the following pertinent observations: applying Swift v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] EWCA Civ 193, under the Convention a state need only pursue a legitimate aim in a proportionate way: Strasbourg does not demand that it do any more; the court must give considerable weight to informed legislative choices, at least where the state is seeking to reconcile the competing interests of different groups in society; and a legislative or regulatory… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:35 am
Here is the complaint in Atlantic Richfield Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 2:45 am
Supreme Court Smith, R. v [2011] UKSC 37 (20 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Barkshire & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim B3 (20 July 2011) Hewgill & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1778 (20 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Interactive Investor Trading Ltd v City Index Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 837 (20 July 2011) AQ (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 833 (20 July 2011) … [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kuku, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 2533 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) KCI Licensing Inc & Ors v Smith & Nephew Plc & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1260 (18 November 2010) Starglade Properties Ltd v Nash [2010] EWCA Civ 1314 (19 November 2010) Tilson v Alstom Transport [2010] EWCA Civ 1308 (19 November 2010) Ingram v Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 1313 (19 November 2010) High Court… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) M, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 792 (26 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crammer v West Bromwich Building Society & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 517 (25 April 2012) AM, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 521 (26 April 2012) Hess Corporation v Stena Drillmax III Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 522 (26 April 2012) Kinsley v The Commissioner of Police… [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 2:19 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Austin & Anor v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2007] EWCA Civ 989 (15 October 2007) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 968 (10 October 2007) Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970 (10 October 2007) Procter & Gamble Company v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 936 (10 October 2007) Charman… [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) The Mayor of London v Hall & Ors [2010] EWHC 1613 (QB) (29 June 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) Dominion Corporate Trustees Ltd& Anor v Capmark Bank Europe Plc [2010] EWHC 1605 (Ch) (29 June 2010) The PNPF Trust Company Ltd v Taylor & Ors [2010] EWHC 1573 (Ch) (28 June 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Tesco Stores Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local… [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:53 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:07 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) McKillen v Misland (Cyprus) Investments Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 179 (24 February 2012) MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 139 (23 February 2012) Rahmatullah v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs & Anor (No 2) [2012] EWCA Civ 182 (23 February 2012) Smith v Nottinghamshire Police [2012] EWCA Civ 161 (23 February 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Neave… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:58 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gurung v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 62 (02 February 2012) Aksu v London Borough of Enfield [2012] EWCA Civ 60 (02 February 2012) County Leasing Asset Management Ltd & Anor v Michael Green Plant Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 53 (02 February 2012) UG (Nepal) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer [2012] EWCA Civ 58 (02 February 2012) Leeds City Council v Price… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:24 am
Supreme Court Patmalniece v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] UKSC 11 (16 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rose v R. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 1:09 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
ORS 164.887 (set out below)....We conclude that the statute does not violate any provision of the Oregon Constitution, but that it does violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution....We therefore conclude that, because it contains the impermissible labor-nonlabor distinction, ORS 164.887 violates the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
