Search for: "State v. Pierre" Results 101 - 120 of 449
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
On the other hand, it is possible that the DST violates both the fundamental freedoms and the state aid rules. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:33 am by Jonathan Bailey
In March 1994, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down one of the most important decisions in modern copyright history: Campbell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to summary judgment on its contributory trademark infringement claim. * Verbena Products v Pierre Fabre Dermo-Cosmetique USA, Inc., 1:19-cv-23616-RNS (S.D. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 5:46 pm
Boredom: The Literary History of a State of Mind. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am by Thomas Key
This part of the book concludes with Ruth Herz' chapter on visual arts produced by legal minds, including Judge Pierre Cavellat and law professor Werner Gephart. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
France It is reported that French author Ariane Fornia has been found guilty of defamation, after Pierre Joxe, a former government minister challenged her claim of sexual assault. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:29 am
Lungowe and Others Cameron Miles, The MV “Norstar” Case (Panama v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 2:50 pm by Kevin Kaufman
First, the proposal states that “consumer-facing” businesses are the focus. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
Canada had a new minister of justice, Pierre Elliott Trudeau. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:45 pm by NBlack
For example in 2012, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed this issue in Pierre Domville v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 3:30 am by Michael Yu
The professors discuss how an SMLLC “can be used to blunt the negative effects” (P. 325) (arguably, more successfully than an FLP) as to Internal Revenue Code sections 2512, 1015, and 2036, in part because of a Tax Court case, Pierre v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]