Search for: "State v. Pineda" Results 101 - 120 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 7:17 am by Greg Blankinship
Code, § 1747.08, a nearly identical statute, the California Supreme Court recently held in Pineda v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am by Steve Satterfield
  (The California Supreme Court reached this same conclusion interpreting a very similar statute in Pineda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 12:33 am
Barry Trupin, defendant-appellee NEW YORK COUNTYLabor LawIRCA Does Not Preclude Illegal Workers From Pursuing Claims to Recover Money for Work Already Performed Pineda v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
  As previously suggested, the Court appears to be holding Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Nordstrom California Supreme Court: Retail Privacy Statute Doesn’t Apply to Download Transactions – Apple v Superior Court (Krescent) CA Court Confirms that Pineda v Williams-Sonoma (the Zip-Code-as-PII Case) Applies Retrospectively — Dardarian v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:02 pm by Susan Brenner
Pineda-Moreno, 591 F.3d 1212 (9th Cir. 2010); and U.S. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
The Court appears to be holding Pineda-Moreno v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm by Craig Hoffman
”  However, in February 2011, the California Supreme Court issued a decision in Pineda v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
The Supreme Court first confronted the use of devices to monitor vehiclular movment in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:00 am by Shaun McParland Baldwin
  A rash of class action suits have been filed following a recent ruling by California Supreme Court in Pineda v. [read post]