Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,032
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
The CPP aimed to effect this shift by setting stringent goals for each state to cut power plant emissions by 2030. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:46 am
Ag Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
”The case, Alma v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Ashe County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:31 am
The case is Citizens for Groundwater Protection et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
Monsanto v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
Complaint Union Brings Suit After Swift RaidsYarrito v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 8:07 am
EPA, which ruled that Clean Air Act regulations had to target individual power plants rather than giving states flexibility regarding how to meet broader standards. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 10:27 pm
Supreme Court ruling, Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:17 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
” One of the biggest problems — which has supported other failures in safety protocols at the plant — is the insistence by plant officials to continue to use paper records, according to the confidential document. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
(North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am
Under the first alternative, interstate trading of emissions allowances would be prohibited, although trading among power plants within states would continue. [read post]
