Search for: "State v. Pound"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2015, 3:38 am
The application of the cap reduced their specified benefits by £;55-£75 per week. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:26 am
Briefly, the NRP had entered into an IVA under which his creditors would receive a total of 27p in the pound over a period of 5 years, in full and final settlement of his liabilities. 94% of his debts were represented by arrears of child maintenance. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:34 pm
NOT CHARGED – Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:30 am
HHJ Lewis noted the Court’s discretion to award a single award in the case or two or more libels, as stated in Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers [2017] EWHC 543 (QB). [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 6:38 am
RR sued, and Portugal’s Supreme Court finally awarded him €50,000 (£42,550) in non-pecuniary damages, and €65,758 (about £55.850) in pecuniary damages. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:03 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 8:58 am
Reece v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:40 pm
This post concerns a similar case to the Hale v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:14 pm
In Arcadia and Others v Telegraph Warby J did note that “proportionality cannot be assessed by reference to any damages claim, or any other financial yardstick” and indicated that fees in excess of the guideline rates may be allowed (seemingly up to £550 compared to the guideline rates of £409 and the Claimants’ solicitors rate of £690). [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 12:11 pm
We note that the Nevada Supreme Court recently decided A Cab, LLC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Dixon v Marchant, handed down yesterday, may, I think, lead to some debate, and not just amongst family lawyers. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 5:20 pm
Citing the principles set out in Alexander v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 9:40 pm
In a recurring classic example, Northeastern Pennsylvania Imaging Center v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
In short they require that the sponsoring partner has a gross annual income of at least £18,600 (the minimum income level or MIR) with an additional £3,800 for the first dependent non-EEA national child and £2,400 for each additional such child. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:32 am
The article reported on what was stated in the Letter. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
In CG v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm
King J stated that if there were no aggravating factors, he would have awarded Mr Woodward £10,000 for harm to his reputation, hurt feelings and distress. [read post]
