Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
State Department, Matthew Miller, said today. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
SOC’s two reservation boundaries majority opinions, Hagen and Yankton, are prime examples of a policy-oriented, political compromise-seeking judging philosophy that somehow led to “states’ rights” victories. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
However, politics and the human cost aside, what ifan adversary (both state and non-state actor) does exploit the current global crisis of massmigration due to globalization, war, and political unrest? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:40 am
Reports state that calm has since been restored to the area. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
Frank Thorp V and Megan Lebowitz report for NBC News. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
It is also to note that according to the same poll, 90% of Tunisians reject the recognition of a “State of Israel. [read post]
25 Nov 2023, 1:38 am
In U.S. f/u/b/o Exposed Roof Design, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Furthermore, it was held in Davis v United States (8th Cir. 1917) that a public trial is broadly defined as a trial at which the public is free to attend. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
This case is a prime illustration of such practices. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
In my view no president or prime minister, nor any member of the public, will think of her reputation in reduced terms as a result of it. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 9:25 am
Published Decisions The Queen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
