Search for: "State v. Prosper" Results 101 - 120 of 706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
In short, these amici tend to acknowledge that the Court to which they are making their plea is not the Court that in 1986 issued Bowers v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 9:25 am by NCC Staff
Democratic National Committee (2021) and Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm by David Jacobson
Fourth, Cabcharge is a prosperous public listed company with significant resources. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm by Ryke Longest
” Disputes among users and their political leaders come quickly behind the spread of economic prosperity. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:04 pm
There were many more questions than answers; and substantial concern about the state of the judicial project and its interposition within the framework of American government--not because it is bad or good, but because it appears now  affect the stability and prosperity of the nation in important ways. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 1:41 am by Steve Lubet
Americans for Prosperity went all in for Justice Barrett, “launching a significant national ad campaign” on her behalf, focused on “eleven key states. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
This landmark decision will help secure a healthier and more prosperous future for all Americans. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:29 pm by WIMS
This landmark decision will help secure a healthier and more prosperous future for all Americans. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm
ADDED: "[V]ariations on the phrase have been used by politicians and states — including New Jersey, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia — to describe their own pro-business policies for at least two decades. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:25 pm by Caitlin Borgmann
In his New York Times op-ed column today, Ross Douthat discusses Naomi Cahn and June Carbone’s book, “Red Families v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:34 pm by WIMS
On consideration, in brief summary, the Appeals Court Order indicates, "The petition of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, joined by the State of Alaska, Peabody Energy Company, Southeastern Legal Foundation, et al., State Petitioners and Intervenors for Petitioners, for rehearing en banc; and the petition of the National Association of Manufacturers, et al. for rehearing en banc in No. 10-1073, et al. and No. 10-1167, et al., and… [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:52 am by Walter Olson
Crane, Cato Regulation magazine] “Solicitor General Inveighs Against Antitrust-Law Revolution in SCOTUS ‘Apple v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In Wall v Judicial Committee of the Highwood Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, (Alberta Ct. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 11:37 am by Amy Howe
The case, Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]