Search for: "State v. Quirk"
Results 101 - 120
of 288
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 10:10 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments by Eric] CollegeSource, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
Perhaps it’s a quirk of section 1983 litigation? [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:05 am
The latest entry is Wallace v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:02 pm
” Wahl v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:16 am
See FDA v. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 1:01 pm
The Oracle v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 7:49 am
Moreover, the weird situation in which $50 per incident is available classwide may well be a quirk of federal court/state procedure interaction. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
Courts of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:06 pm
The quirk about the case was that the trial court gave a jury instruction which tracked the law in the now-overruled, supposedly objective and morally shorn People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 1:19 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with comments by Eric] Sorrell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:10 pm
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast, featuring audio from a virtual event on espionage fiction, hosted by the Michael V. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:06 am
Second, it’s not like this quirk of Section 230 jurisprudence is obscure or has been a closely-kept secret. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
The court ignored the fact that the tactic also dramatically increased the potential recovery by the class because of the quirk in the FDCPA.In response to the court's order to show cause, counsel cites Mace v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 5:45 pm
Day also argued that the agreement was unenforceable as a result of the “material change” doctrine, a unique state quirk that requires execution of new restrictive covenants upon a material change in an employment relationship. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:58 am
The short story is that the sentence preserves the Perfect 10 v. ccBill “salient” in Section 230 jurisprudence, which says that Section 230 can apply to state IP laws–including trade secrets. ccBill is only the law in the 9th Circuit, but nevertheless it’s become a crucial part of Section 230 jurisprudence. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 3:47 am
Tris Pharma v. [read post]
