Search for: "State v. R. N." Results 101 - 120 of 7,971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Simon Lester
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Simon Lester
Some preliminary data on imports of EVs into EU The import statistics between 2020-2023[v] do show a certain increasing trend of imports of new EVs from China into EU. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am by Elizabeth Goitein
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
’s inability to oppose the defendant’s motion for summary judgment with competent evidentiary proof, the AD1unanimously affirmed the underlying determination.That seriously had to hurt.# # #DECISIONT. v R. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
  As of July 18, 2023, a total of 10 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from four states (CA (2), HI (1), OR (1), WA (6)). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 10:28 am by Russell Knight
R. 201(n) “Objections at depositions shall be concise, stating the exact legal nature of the objection. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
The rapid speed at which AI capabilities are advancing compels the United States to lead in this moment for the sake of our security, economy, and society. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct)  lcb11@psu.edu     Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
 In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]