Search for: "State v. Residential Unit & Real Estate" Results 101 - 120 of 267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
  The residential parcel is known as “Lot 9” in the 9-unit residential subdivision known as Hidden Hills. [read post]
1 Apr 2017, 9:00 am by William W. Abbott
The changes left the plan boundaries intact and did not change the total number of residential units or maximum non-residential uses. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  City’s general plan contains two alternative goals for the area, specifically, a preferred goal of community open space and an alternative one of development with up to 1,375 residential units, 75,000 square feet of retail, and 75 hotel rooms. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 1:53 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The modifications did not change the project footprint or alter the number of residential units or allowable commercial square footage. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The bona fide purchaser doctrine is codified in section 13.001 of the Texas Property Code, entitled "Validity of Unrecorded Instrument," which states: (a) A conveyance of real property or an interest in real property or a mortgage or deed of trust is void as to a creditor or to a subsequent purchaser for a valuable consideration without notice unless the instrument has been acknowledged, sworn to, or proved and filed for record as required by law. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:12 pm by Wolfgang Demino
EVICTION SUIT DIFFERS FROM SUIT TO RESOLVE OWNERSHIP ISSUES (TITLE TO REAL ESTATE)  A forcible detainer action is an expedited proceeding intended to "provide a speedy, simple, and inexpensive means for resolving the question of the right to possession of premises" where no unlawful entry occurs. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 8:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
On November 7, 2016, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a published opinion mostly upholding the EIR for a 48.75-acre, 328-unit residential infill project (known as McKinley Village) against various CEQA challenges, and finding the Project to be consistent with the City of Sacramento’s general plan. [read post]