Search for: "State v. Rodriquez"
Results 101 - 120
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Rodriquez (crimes that qualify for enhanced sentence under armed career criminal law; specific issue involves state drug crime conviction)06-11543 -- Begay v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 8:30 am
• United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:17 pm
Join us back here tomorrow for a preview of the argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
2 May 2017, 7:38 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals recognized this procedural deficiency nearly fifteen years ago in Rodriquez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm
” As noted above, the Seventh Circuit in Judge v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:17 am
The case, Pena-Rodriquez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 9:49 am
In its October 30 decision, United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:27 am
Supreme Court in Pedro-Rodriquez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
Beckon * Employee Blogging Risks * Employee Terminated for Facebook Message Fails to State Public Policy Claim — Barnett v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:36 pm
Rodriquez 125 days 6-3 2; Alito(m), Souter(d) Gonzalez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
"Our side" considered it a loss (I was lobbying for the Innocence Project of Texas on the subject), but the law simply did not give criminal defendants the means to keep eyewitness testimony out of evidence if lineups don't follow written policies, nor if written policies are inadequate.Ironically, though Chief Rodriguez wants to blame the Legislature for his woes, the much more significant penalty for failing to follow best practices was laid down in October by the Texas Court of… [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Update: As correctly noted by Mike Sachs, Chief Justice Roberts’ most significant betrayal to date was in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 11:49 am
McMahon, 482 U.S. 222 (1987) (Exchange Act claims); Rodriquez de Quijas v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 11:28 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 10:57 am
Supreme Court in Rodriquez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
Atlanta Court Upholds Doocing For Snarky Facebook Post — Rodriquez v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
Case citation: Salaita v. [read post]
