Search for: "State v. Rosas" Results 101 - 120 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2018, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Hoping to blame Pacific Gas & Electric power lines for Northern California fires, lawyers from coast to coast descend on wine country [Paul Payne, Santa Rosa Press-Democrat] Courts should police lawyers’ handling of class actions, including temptation to sweep additional members with doubtful claims into class so as to boost fees [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Reilly Stephens on Cato certiorari amicus in case of Yang v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Background Facts and Procedural HistoryOn September 8, 2014, Midland Funding sued Rosa Gonzales in the Nolan County Court at Law and alleged that she had an unpaid credit card account. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Background Facts and Procedural HistoryOn September 8, 2014, Midland Funding sued Rosa Gonzales in the Nolan County Court at Law and alleged that she had an unpaid credit card account. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:38 pm by Rumpole
 Confronted with the law, see, Makemson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:54 am by Michael DelSignore
  In a 6-3 opinion written by notoriously conservative Justice Gorsuch, the United States Supreme Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in Bostock v. [read post]