Search for: "State v. S. R. R."
Results 101 - 120
of 71,935
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2015, 7:42 am
Witness Exxon’s pleas to the Texas Supreme Court to dismiss Lazy R’s claims. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
R. [read post]
21 May 2013, 5:45 am
In R. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 2:27 am
The judgments in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (McGeogh) v The Lord President of the Council and Another (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 63 were handed down in October 2013. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:45 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 23 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press SummaryFor a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R v O’Brien [2014] UKSC 23 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 5:04 am
State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 2:43 am
For judgment, please download: [2014] UKSC 34 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R v Ahmad & Anor; Fields & Ors v CPS [2014] UKSC 36 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 11:56 pm
The post Case Comment: R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 49 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
S. 33.1 and R. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
(ii) The narrow vires ground Previously, in the case of Alvi v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2208, the Supreme Court had held that if a matter fell within the scope of s 3(2) of the 1971 Act, it must be regulated in the Immigration Rules and could not be validly regulated by other means, such as by the Secretary of State’s policy. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 9:13 am
Cojocar v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:52 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
No Legal Way Out: R v Ryan, Domestic Abuse, and the Defence of Duress. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
S. 33.1 and R. v. [read post]
