Search for: "State v. Shary"
Results 101 - 120
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 8:31 am
More persuasive is Victor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 8:47 am
From yesterday's Seventh Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 7:56 am
V. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
This essay explores the possible dual readings of AT&T v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:16 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Two Cheers for Recess Appointments Peter Shane (Ohio State University) | June 26 As losses go, NLRB v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:57 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:53 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:07 pm
As the Pentagon’s only serious and honest (and of course now former) expert on Islamic Law, Major Stephen Coughlin observed in 2007: If the Enemy in the War on Terror (WOT) states that he fights jihad in furtherance of Islamic causes that includes the imposition of Shari’a law and the re-establishment of the Caliphate; And Islamic law on jihad exists and is available in English; Then Professionals with WOT responsibilities have an affirmative, personal,… [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:18 am
Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The apparent contradiction within the House of Lords’ decision might be explained by the numerous Turkish cases they cite: Karaduman v Turkey (1993) 74 DR 93, Kalaç v Turkey (1997) 27 EHRR 552, and most importantly, Sahin v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 8, which was heard before the ECtHR. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In its recent case, FDA v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:55 am
Neil Dukoff, an AICPA member, and Shari Dukoff, as his dependent, entered into a group life insurance contract with Prudential Insurance for Mrs. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 3:37 am
In America after the end of Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:26 am
This leads to a rare potential victory for someone who illegally came to the U.S. from Indonesia, and who is seeking to reopen his asylum case.From Sihotang v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:31 am
In the Wall Street Journal (10/21) Health Blog, Jacob Goldstein wrote, "The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) has come out against the drug industry in Wyeth v. [read post]
