Search for: "State v. Si"
Results 101 - 120
of 769
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
Reading their essays gives one a good picture of the state of issues that are boiling just beneath the surface within Cuba. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
y que la sanción se aplica al margen de si existió mayor o menor intencionalidad o grado de negligencia. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:39 am
Si hay una inminente fuente de litigios contencioso-administrativos, esa es la responsabilidad patrimonial derivada de la asistencia sanitaria. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:47 am
The changes to the legislation to achieve this are contained in the Intellectual Property (Copyright and Related Rights) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019 No. 605).Sui generis database rights in the EUUnder the Directive, databases made by EEA nationals, residents or businesses receive protection in all EEA member states. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:32 am
However, the Administration likes to slam the doors and not carry out ex officio review procedures because they require collecting reports from the State Council, among others. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:51 pm
See Anunciato et al. v Biden et al. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:26 pm
The Cuban government announced, as is its habit now, through the show "Mesa Redonda", a set of potentially far ranging reforms of the non state sector and its regulation. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:33 am
Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:23 pm
We looked at Northwood Solihull Ltd v Fearn & Ors (2020) EWHC 3538 (QB) in this post (now with an addition) and I discussed it in this video. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 3:58 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 5:30 am
Incluso, si se hubiese activado, nos parece que la mayoría de las arrendatarias no serían elegible. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 5:35 am
[UQ v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 7:41 am
Lion Biotechnologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02086-SI,United States District Court for the Northern District of California.) [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:22 am
Lo advierto por si la somnolencia le viene con esta lectura, aunque si usted se pierde, la culpa la tiene el guía, o sea, yo. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Arcona, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:46 am
The Secure Tenancies (Notices) Regulations 1987 (SI 1987/755) appears to have previously only been updated once (SI 2005/1226) prior to the primary legislation updates in schedule 29 Coronavirus Act 2020, now updated. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:43 pm
Guangdong Faanlong Co, Ltd and Others 2015 Sui Zhong Min Si Fa Chu No.62? [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 7:30 am
(…) En efecto, si concluimos, como hemos de hacer, que la intervención de las autoridades, que no del resto del personal de los órganos de la Confederación, se limita a la firma de las resoluciones que le propone el personal de la Empresa Pública, deberá convenirse que dicha autoridades si limitan a aceptar la propuesta o, cuando más, a la constatación de la idoneidad y legalidad del contenido de dichas propuestas, porque… [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 9:12 am
SI: [00:09:15] I think one of the one of one of the cases that term that I think had an impact was Moore v. [read post]
