Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 101 - 120 of 789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 3:03 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in King v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:23 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Attorney General Reference No. 116 of 2009 [2010] EWCA Crim 577 (11 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MC (Algeria), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 347 (31 March 2010) Raissi v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Civ 337 (31 March 2010) Clarke & Anor v Corless & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 338 (31 March 2010) Child Maintenance and Enforcement… [read post]
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:52 am
The Court did not seem to take note of the devolution of constitutional responsibilities and stuck to the age old line taken in Kartar Singh v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Somraj Singh, Opposition No. 91175272 (December 10, 2008) [not precedential].Opposer established the fame of its mark via testimony that it has 4,315 office in the United States, 80,00 sales associates, and a 16% market share. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Applying Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 and Lumba [2011] UKSC 12, detaining B would exceed the implied limits on the exercise of administrative power to detain for immigration purposes. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
However, Dr Butt’s case seems materially different from British Chiropractic Association v Singh ([2011] 1 WLR 133) which was relied on by the Judge. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
s other leading “fair comment” case – BCA v Singh ([2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appellant was diagnosed with severe post-traumatic stress disorder and claimed her immigration detention was contrary to the Hardial Singh principles and contrary to the Secretary of State’s policy in respect of detaining persons suffering with mental illness. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:49 pm
On Valentine's Day this year, the Supreme Court delivered its decision in the Rajendra Singh Rana case, disqualifying 13 MLAs in the U.P. [read post]