Search for: "State v. South"
Results 101 - 120
of 11,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2015, 11:14 am
In South Carolina state courts, a plaintiff must proceed under South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure 23, which establishes the requirements for class certification. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 11:14 am
In South Carolina state courts, a plaintiff must proceed under South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure 23, which establishes the requirements for class certification. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
In Jorsache v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:14 pm
These preinstallation agreements cover almost all Android devices sold in the United States.United States of America, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, South Carolina and Texas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 4:57 am
In Linog v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 8:37 am
In light of the Supreme Court ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 1:34 pm
Just a head’s up to all the South Florida criminal defense attorneys who are following the hot topic of the constitutionality of Florida’s drug possession statute, section 893.13: the Florida Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
Related Cases: Jewel v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:08 pm
The recent case of State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 12:53 pm
Recently, a case was filed in the United States District Court of South Carolina, alleging that a deceased man’s civil rights had been violated after he died on the job. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 1:33 pm
The South Carolina Supreme Court Thursday ruled that the state’s six week abortion ban is unconstitutional and antithetical to the right to privacy. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am
South Carolina is by no means a high tax state in the main, though it can feel that way for certain taxpayers. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 10:38 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Drakeford v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 10:38 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Drakeford v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:21 pm
In Harris v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v B- where delay was used to refuse to return a child to Australia, because he was well settled in South Africa.Central Authority for the Republic of South Africa v Ashmore- where delay was again used to refuse to return a child to Australia. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
The post $3 Million Verdict Against Unknown Trucker Affirmed by South Carolina Appellate Court – Tucker v. [read post]
