Search for: "State v. State Fish and Game Commission"
Results 101 - 120
of 170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2013, 2:27 pm
If the Court does rule in favor of the government and, depending on one's view, either (a) significantly narrow the scope of Nollan and Dolan or (b) refuse to extend those decisions to another, similar context, this would appear contrary to the Court's recent decision in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm
The decision has important state-wide implications because it precludes the use of the CESA petition process to seek reconsideration of listing decisions of the Fish and Game Commission. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:21 pm
The first, Arkansas Fish & Game Commission v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:43 am
United States (taxation of gaming proceeds) Northern Arapaho Tribe v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission of Montana. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 5:18 pm
On October 3, 2012, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 4:55 am
11-597 ARKANSAS GAME & FISH COMMISSION v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:58 pm
Karuk Tribe of California (tribal consultation, fish and wildlife).* U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 8:55 am
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012): Is the federal government shifting the focus in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission? [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
Consider, for example, the temporary takings case on the Court’s docket, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:16 am
Those of you who attended the recent CLE session at the ABA Annual Meeting about Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
Brief for the Respondent, Arkansas Game & Fish Comm'n v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
Counsel for the petitioner previewed arguments before the Supreme Court in Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
United States: In People v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:36 pm
Williams — federal habeas court duty to defer to state court ruling on a federal constitutional issue, if the state court has ruled without mentioning the issue (grant limited to Question 1) 11-597 — Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 9:10 am
" In Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
Game & Fish Commission v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Lawrence Hurley at Environment & Energy News covers the Court’s recent cert. grant in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
