Search for: "State v. T. B." Results 101 - 120 of 18,484
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2024, 6:07 am by Marty Lederman
Khan has not, for example, made any charges under Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 4:19 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Pappas v B & G Holding Co. (2024 NY Slip Op 51218(U) [Sup Ct, Bronx County Sept. 6, 2024]), was reminiscent of the Worbes case I blogged about and then substituted in as counsel helping to bring the case to a successful conclusion – but with the parties’ roles reversed. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 11:33 am by Giles Peaker
So Rakusen v Jepsen/superior landlord issues may become academic anyway. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
I don’t think that, given the history since 2019 when it was a Conservative manifesto commitment, Labour’s manifesto commitment and the clear commitment from the Secretary of State to ‘day one’ ending of section 21, anyone can claim to be taken by surprise. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 5:50 am by Greg Lambert
Vincent AI will come back and say, risks to goon, do you represent party a or party B? [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
B Magazine buys from private detectives a picture of the pair in a hotel room in a state of dishabille and publishes it. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 6:37 pm by centerforartlaw
”[7] To strip a foreign sovereign of immunity, such suit must involve (1) property taken in violation of international law, and (2)(a) such property must be present in the United States in connection with a commercial activity carried on by the foreign state, or (2)(b) must be possessed by an “agency or instrumentality” of the foreign state that also carries on commercial activity in the United States.[8] When claimants file suit against… [read post]